Radiocarbon 14 dating of the Shroud of Turin
Updated GMT HKT February 9, CNN My name is Mark Goodacreand I am a professor of New Shrour and Christian origins in the Department of Religious Studies at Duke University. I was series adviser and one of many on-camera experts on CNN's " Finding Jesus ," which premiered Sunday evening. I also appear in each episode of the program. Politics Money Entertainment Tech Sport Travel Style Health Video VR. Africa Americas Asia China Europe Middle East Opinion.
Politics 45 Congress Security The Nine Trumpmerica State. Business Markets Tech Luxury. Stars Screen Binge Culture Media. Business Culture Gadgets Future Startups. Sport Trin Golf Tennis Motorsport Horseracing Equestrian Sailing Skiing. Fashion Design Architecture Arts Autos Luxury. Features Freedom Project Impact Your World Inside Africa 2 degrees All Datkng. Video Video news Feature shows HLN TV shows TV schedule Faces of CNN Worldwide CNNVR. How To Watch VR Archives.
More… Shroud of turin fake carbon dating Carobn Heroes CNN Profiles Leadership Pressroom Partner sites iReport. By Mark Goodacre Updated GMT February 9, Chat with us in Facebook Messenger. Find out what's happening in the world as it unfolds. JUST WATCHED Could this be Jesus' burial cloth? Could this be Jesus' burial cloth? Story highlights Turon professor Mark Goodacre appears in each episode of the program He defends the carbon dating used to determine the age of the Daying of Turin.
Science and archaeology offer insights into ancient artifacts that could be fo to Jesus Christ. Viewers were invited to tweet and post their questions to Facebook during the show. Below are some of the most interesting, and my answers to them. Is there a better way to check the shroud than carbon dating? I've been told carbon dating is very inaccurate. Mark Goodacre is a professor of religious studies at Duke University. Actually, carbon dating is an excellent way to ascertain the date of an artifact.
Many are disappointed, not surprisingly, that the shroud dated to between AD and I recall my own disappointment but not surprise on hearing the results back in But the scientists czrbon the carbon dating were not amateurs, and the samples were tested in three separate labs. Moreover, the carbon date cohered with other evidence that the shroud was a medieval forgery, like the fact that there is furin evidence of its existence tugin the 14th ffake. So I know the carbon dating was off, but wasn't tufin later shown that the piece of cloth used for the testing was a section that had been repaired after some fire damage or something?
Which carbo explain why it dated different? JUST WATCHED Examining the Shroud of Turin. Examining the Shroud of Turin No, that's not been established. Those who defend the authenticity of the shroud often say the sample might have been taken from a part of the shroud that was repaired after it was damaged by fire in the 16th century. But this is special pleading. The scientists who took the sample oof what they were doing. Professor Christopher Ramsey noted that the unusual weave on the sample matched the weave shroud of turin fake carbon dating the rest of the shroud perfectly.
So were Jesus' wrists nailed or his hands? All shows and movies have his hands nailed. One of the curiosities about the Turin Shroud is that the figure appears to be nailed through the wrists. This has long intrigued those who have studied crucifixion because shroud of turin fake carbon dating is some anatomical plausibility here -- nails through the wrists would support the body better than nails through the palms of the hands.
It is just possible that the bones of the only crucified victim we have, Jehohanan, show a nail mark above the wrist, but this is disputed. There are two further factors here. One is that victims of crucifixion may often have been tied instead of or as well as being nailed. Also, some dispute whether the shroud figure is nailed through the wrists. See Antonio Lombatti's graphic.
Once again, Mary Magdalene is totally ignored. They used the Gospel that described Peter as having discovered the empty tomb. When other Gospels fakw Magdalene as the one that discovered it and then she called out to others. Jesus on the cross, as portrayed by Adam Bond. Well, you will be pleased to hear that there is an entire episode devoted to Mary Magdalene in this series, and her identity and role are fully explored, including her presence at the empty tomb.
I think you'll enjoy it. About the CNN program on Jesus. Good stuff, but I am not sure about Jesus crying out in pain. The lamb is silent. I found Adam Bond's portrayal of Jesus' death shroux the drama really compelling, and his cry is quite arresting. It's true that Isaiah It is apparently fulfilled in Jesus' silence during his trial e.