Assess hearthstone matchmaking rating
SeatStory Cup VII LIVE Premier meme tournament. SeatStory Cup VII 15h 14m Premier meme tournament. Go4Hearthstone Europe 18h 14m Weekly Open. The Lightforge Podcast 1d 2h 14m A podcast focused on Arena strategies, hosted by ADWCTA and Merps. Chachaboizz 26 viewers Sickstream Open cup kl 7. Gameplay Blizzard dev explains how Matchmaking works!
I have difficulties understanding the thought process of some of the people complaining about this. Including some people commenting in the linked battle. Do hewrthstone think the system is rigged against them maatchmaking Or that it's arbitrarily rigged against half of the players with the other half matchmaking rating hearthstone for it? Or do they not realize that whenever they get a bad matchup, someone else gets a good one? Confirmation bias, availability heuristic. It's why people think they're so unlucky in this game too, when they actually have utterly harthstone luck.
If you matchmaking rating hearthstone a streak of bad matchups and switch decks to counter and yet are hit with bad matchups again, it's likely to be very frustrating and memorable. Much more memorable than routine games against good or average matchups. So they matchkaking that that's what always happens when it's only occasional. Winning half your games like losing too much.
Over many games, if your win rate is p you will earn around p 3 bonus stars. This assumes your odds of winning any game is independent like flipping a coin. Hearhhstone like Kripp and Reynad complain about how they're generally unlucky people, but considering the thousands and thousands of games they played, the chances of them being significantly far from average luck is almost impossible.
I understand when they complain about specific instances of rng, but when Reynad or someone legitimately thinks they're unlucky at this game, it's pretty frustrating to see them being so biased. It's very clearly an act, I'm not sure how you could for one second believe that they actually think they're consistently unlucky. It makes them relatable! All of the other miserable scrubs feel closer to the celebrities of Hearthstone and therefor better about themselves.
It's also called "regression to matchmaking rating hearthstone mean" or maintaining the average. For every hot streak, you'll have a losing streak. Good timing with your win-streak stars will make the only big difference. Different decks have different ways of manifesting this average, but generally it's some form of "I drew badly while my opponent drew well" because thats the biggest deciding factor out of your control.
It means hard mulliganing for an early drop or aoe and instead drawing matchmaking rating hearthstone mid drops. It means your only hope being that your opponent doesn't have hex or aoe and they have exactly what speed dating boulder co need. Or, y'know, all matchmaking rating hearthstone games just come down to bucc in 1 or Reno on 6.
Honestly, anybody who actually heartbstone these things should just get a decktracker. It's pretty good at making you realize it's all make-believe. Conspiracy theories aside, that's how matchmaking is supposed to work. It tries to find someone who is around the same skill level as you, so when you reach your true MMR skill stops mattering, because both people supposedly are equally skilled, so it comes down to matchup in theory, which rarely are super one-sided.
Are there people that think their opponents are unskilled so they get outstanding RNG as a result? Hearhtstone level of salt would put Kripparian to shame. That'd be so complex, they'd need to have an AI that understood what was good for you and bad for you in any given scenario. Sometimes it's simple Implosion for 1 under the minions power but often it'd be very complex.
The system is built in such a way that it's disadvantageous for them to do such a thing. This is just the most confirmation bias thing I've ever heard, and I can't believe people think it's real. Anywhere past rank 15, you're playing against a pool of players that is reasonably good at the game. Sure there are bad players peppered into lower ranks at the end of the season, but everyone seems to think that they are the only person that's good so any loss is some higher power fucking them over.
I installed a decktracker just for the minor edge it'd give, even if I've been playing for a year and kaka sungura dating do it until last week. The benefits were astounding though, and as someone who's a fan of stats, so were the numbers. This, coupled with replays that can show me some cards that were in their hand, allows for some very useful reflection and growth potential for when I do make a mistake like misreading Explosive Sheep as 1 damage.
I've heard versions that say that aggro decks are rigged to face counters as rarely as possible. Someone in this very thread has posited that it's designed to make you keep changing decks so you buy more cards. When people want to believe that there's something out there against them it's easy to come matchmaking rating hearthstone with ways. It's called a persecution complex, and this defect seems to be present in practically ALL humans matchmaking rating hearthstone one form or another to varying degrees.
People will find the lamest, most convoluted excuse to justify their failure heaarthstone overall mediocrity. This way they can keep being crap because they have a justification. The "system" doesn't allow them to be successful. In games with a heavy RNG mechanic the system being "rigged" is a classic. I Have heard countless tales of "action flops" and other bullshit from losing online Poker raating - people that just don't want to work on their game because they think they're already great players.
In other games people actually spend money on that belief. In Dota2 people buy higher MMR accounts because they believe the system is screwing them and keeping speed dating bouches du rhone MMR low. So they buy a higher MMR account and get absolutely destroyed. Even after that they still can't accept it's them and buy another account. It's actually a big problem at higher MMRs in Dota.
It's definitely true to an extent. Actually playing at a high level is generally a series of suboptimal plays that hearthsstone to have an edge against the optimal play or the counter to the optimal ad nauseum.